Skip to content
Jobs & Teams October 26, 2026

Bluestone PIM Shares AI Know-How Across Its Marketing Team

A content lead put reusable AI instructions where colleagues could use them. The harder work was helping people change how they worked.

By The State of AI Marketing newsroom
Share
Conceptual photograph of colleagues passing a shared folder with the GitHub mark and a single orange update tab
Credit: JAC Growth Marketing

Bluestone PIM’s marketing team has a practical answer to an awkward AI problem: useful instructions sitting on one colleague’s laptop. An October 24 account published by The Irreplaceable Marketer describes content lead Maya Pasek moving that material into a shared GitHub repository. A three-hour workshop helped colleagues use it.

The implementation date isn’t given. This is a newly published account of a team’s working habits. It gives managers a useful example of someone helping colleagues inherit their AI work, with time set aside to teach them.

Newsletter author Ina Toncheva puts the risk in the underlying material plainly:

“AI multiplies what you already do, including what you do badly.”

We’ve covered Buffer’s shared instructions and Mintlify’s knowledge engineer, and job advertisements that omit shared AI responsibilities. Bluestone adds a closer view of the colleague who turns a personal collection into something other people can use.

Give colleagues the work behind the answer

Toncheva reports that Pasek’s team keeps business knowledge and reusable task instructions together. Those instructions, often called skills, tell an AI assistant how the team wants a recurring job done. The shared material includes positioning, brand voice, and prospects’ questions drawn from sales conversations.

That changes the handoff between colleagues. Passing around a finished draft lets another marketer use one answer. Sharing the approved information and instructions lets that person understand what the assistant was asked to do, then apply it to another assignment.

Consider a hypothetical product launch. A writer improves instructions for explaining a feature without overstating what it can do. A colleague preparing a campaign needs that same boundary. Keeping the approved explanation with the reusable instructions gives both people a place to check it. Someone still has to decide whether the explanation is accurate.

GitHub provides a record of file changes and earlier versions. In this account, it’s the shared home for the work. The more consequential management choice is who gets to change an instruction that other colleagues depend on, and how those colleagues learn about the change.

The person who makes it usable

Pasek, identified as head of content in a Bluestone article about its AI model choices, also offers content and AI workflow advice on their own website. The workshop in Toncheva’s account gives colleagues time to connect their tools and work through an unfamiliar process together.

A manager copying the approach should include that teaching time in the assignment. Expecting a useful folder to explain itself leaves its creator answering the same questions privately.

There is also a maintenance decision after the workshop. If a colleague improves an instruction, another person needs to understand why. A short change note could explain which output was wrong and what the revision should improve. That gives the next person enough context to challenge the change, rather than treating every saved instruction as approved policy.

Those are suggested working practices, not additional processes we verified at Bluestone.

Keep the evidence narrow

The account describes two earlier tool changes that left work behind. Plain files give the team material it can carry to another tool, although that doesn’t establish that every automation will run unchanged after a move.

We haven’t inspected the repository or independently tested its results. Toncheva’s story is the source for the workflow and workshop, rather than an audited productivity study. Pasek also sells content advice and AI workflow services on their own site, a commercial interest readers should know about.

The workshop is the management choice worth carrying into another marketing team. A marketer asked to make their work useful to colleagues needs time to teach it and keep it current. Give that responsibility a place in their workload, with an explicit decision about which existing assignment moves to make room.

Quoted in this story

  • Ina Toncheva, Author, The Irreplaceable Marketer (source)

Want your perspective in coverage like this? Get quoted.

Sources

This story is part of our running coverage: The State of AI and Marketing Jobs →

Get Net Effect, our Monday newsletter.

Net Effect is The State of AI Marketing's Monday recap: how AI is changing marketing, the moves brands are making, and what to do next.

Trouble loading the form? Open the signup form .

Related coverage